I didn't read that message ...
A religion is defined by how 'its clerics' and 'followers' define it;
Usually, the mass follow a 'modified', make it 'political' approach of their religions and religions can't be discussed by with the masses.
Let me tell u what's the difference between UMP and FN: NOTHING except the way they 'communicate' on the same issues.
Let me tell u what's the difference between UMP, FN and PS: NOTHING except that each should have 'an' opposite view from the other, while all care for only one thing: White supremacy and sharing the wealth of France.
What I am trying to say is that 'discussing a religion' is not the same as 'discussing the followers' of that religion. Your communication style seems offensive for many.. Communication is the key to keep a debate alive.
NB: I lived 7 years in Europe (mainly France, Belgium and Scotland). I was active socially and politically.
Loves Sabrett Hot Dogs
We are the natives
Mshta2lak Khayeh Beiruti